News

A. Recent or Forthcoming Neurolaw Publications

1. Amanda C. Pustilnik, Legal Evidence of Subjective States: A Brain-Based Model of Chronic Pain Increases Accuracy and Fairness in Law , 25 Harv. Rev. of Psychiatry 279 (2017).
2. Christopher Slobogin, Neuroscience Nuance: Dissecting the Relevance of Neuroscience in Adjudicating Criminal Culpability , J. L. & Biosciences (forthcoming in Journal of Law & the Biosciences).
3. Judith G. Edersheim & Rebecca W. Brendel, Introduction , 25 Harv. Rev. of Psychiatry 259 (2017).
4. Stephen J. Morse, The Science of Addiction and Criminal Law , 25 Harv. Rev. of Psychiatry 261 (2017).
5. Ryan R. Darby & Bradford C. Dickerson, Dementia, Decision Making, and Capacity , 25 Harv. Rev. of Psychiatry 270 (2017).
6. Maya Sabatello & Paul S. Appelbaum, Behavioral Genetics in Criminal and Civil Courts , 25 Harv. Rev. of Psychiatry 289 (2017).
7. Karen D. Davis, Herta Flor, Henry T. Greely, Gian Domenico Iannetti, Sean Mackey, Markus Ploner, Amanda Pustilnik, Irene Tracey, Rolf-Detlef Treede, & Tor D. Wager, Brain imaging tests for chronic pain: medical, legal and ethical issues and recommendations , 13 Nature Rev. Neurology 624 (2017).
8. Gene M. Heyman, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Stephen Morse, & Sally Satel, Brief of Amici Curiae of 11 Addiction Experts in Support of Appellee , U. Penn. L. Sch., Pub. L. Res. Paper No. 17-44 (2017).
9. Anabel Cassady, The Juvenile Ultimatum: Reframing Blended Sentencing Laws To Ensure Juveniles Receive a Genuine 'One Last Chance at Success’ , 102 Minn. L. Rev. 391 (2017).
10. Courtney M. Brokloff Brokloff, Looks Can Kill: The Dark Side of Indoor Tanning and What States Need To Do To Help Protect Young Adults from This Deadly ‘Glow’ , 103 Iowa L. Rev. 271 (2017).
11. Anna Spain Bradley, Cognitive Competence in Executive-Branch Decision Making , 49 Connecticut L. Rev. (2017).
12. Andrea Lavazza, Neurolaw and Punishment: a Naturalistic and Humanitarian View, and its Overlooked Perils , 37 Ethics Law & Cognitive Sci. 81 (2017).
13. Giulio Mecacci & Pim Haselager, Identifying Criteria for the Evaluation of the Implications of Brain Reading for Mental Privacy , Sci. Eng. Ethics (2017).
14. Emily Baron & Jacqueline Sullivan, Judging Mechanistic Neuroscience: A preliminary conceptual-analytic framework for evaluating scientific evidence in the courtroom, Psychol. Crime Law (2017).
15. John R. Shook & James J. Giordano, Moral Bioenhancement for Social Welfare: Are Civic Institutions Ready? , 2 Front. Sociol. 1 (2017).
16. Joseph J. Avery, Neuroethics in Neurolaw: Exploring notions of duality and the implications for evidence and ethics , International Neuroethics Society Academic Essay Winner (2017).
17. Kathleen Curtis, Kyle Willems, & Tom Strand, Litigating Sports Concussions: What You Need to Know about the Science and the Law , 74 Bench & B. Minn. 28 (2017).
18. Lea B. Vaughn, Book Review of Susanna L. Blumenthal, Law and the Modern Mind: Consciousness and Responsibility in American Legal Culture (2016) , 67 J. Legal Educ. (2017).
19. Cristina Scarpazza, Silvia Pellegrini, Pietro Pietrini, & Giuseppe Sartori, The Role of Neuroscience in the Evaluation of Mental Insanity: On the Controversies in Italy , Neuroethics 1 (2017).